Nema nam pomoci
Luka Bulic · Other Songs - Luka Bulic
razmisljam o temi koja bi mogla bit
ovotjedni hit
a bojim se da ne ode sve vrit
ako ukinu stambenu stednju
i ovaj jad od poticaja
Ostat ce nam samo da gladimo jaja
prvo lijevo, onda desno
onda opet lijevo, desno
za druge radnje nemas mjesto
jer je u podstanarstvu tijesno
Sa 67 gazdarica tjera te van
a ti si ne mozes ni tada
priustiti svoj stan
jedino opcenje sto imamo je mozdani sex
vise nas stvarno nije briga
ni za Bruxelles ni za lex
K'o psima kosti
serviraju nam nove glupe teme
moj susjed posti
svaki dan i jedine dileme
su mu hoce li sutra raditi i jesti
ako trazis bolje vijesti
bolje ne gledaj vijesti
Eh, da se jednom nekom normalnome
na tren vlasti domoci
a do tad mi se sve cini da
tu, tu, tu, nema nam pomoci
Nema nam pomoci
The narrator’s anxiety about housing policy quickly becomes a portrait of life with no room to grow. If housing-savings incentives disappear and rent remains high, he jokes, there will be nothing left to do but lie around; at 67, the landlord may still be able to throw him out. The exaggerated refrain is funny because the fear underneath it—never being able to afford a home—is recognizable.
The song turns an abstract policy debate into the intimate arithmetic of rent, age and insecurity. Its humor does not propose a solution; it captures the feeling that every small support is temporary and that even retirement may not bring stability. The entry does not specify a date or identify a particular housing-savings scheme, so the lyric should not be mistaken for a precise policy explainer. No independent review of Bulić’s song was located. The narrator’s final joke lands as a bleak punchline: if the system offers no path to ownership, perhaps the only thing left is to keep waiting in someone else’s apartment.
This lyric fits the social-commentary side of topical pop: it takes an abstract debate about housing incentives and translates it into a single person’s fear of never owning a home. The age reference makes the joke especially bleak, imagining that even a lifetime of waiting might end with a landlord’s notice rather than security. Because the entry does not identify the precise savings policy or its date, the song should be read as a response to housing anxiety, not a policy explainer. Its comedy gives the narrator a voice for a problem that is otherwise reduced to figures and eligibility rules.

