Vlada kupi si aute
Luka Bulic · Other Songs - Luka Bulic
zivi bez velikih zelja
al' zato bez ikakvih kocnica
narucuje se iz fotelja
Ref.
Vlada kupi si aute
bicikl vozi debil
upuc'o je medu i zeku
nas poznati zoofil
Vlada kupi si A6
Corse i Insignije
bar jedan maleni Kedi
i tko zna je li to sve
Narod k'o stado ovcica
upija prozirne price
i kad se nadje pred izborom
opet sve jednako bit' ce
Ref.
Vlada kupi si aute
A list of government cars becomes a punchline about priorities: the refrain contrasts expensive vehicles with a line about cycling, while the verses accuse the public of absorbing political promises and repeating familiar choices. The lyric’s comic shock tactics—especially its deliberately extreme animal-related insult—are designed to jolt rather than to document a specific policy case. The underlying target is the distance between public hardship and the privileges enjoyed by people in power.
That contrast is carried by the song’s repeated inventory of car models, which makes the criticism concrete even when the broader accusations are sweeping. The narrator imagines citizens as a flock, politically passive yet still responsible for the choices they make. Without a date or linked news report in the entry, it is not possible to tie the lyrics to one purchase or cabinet decision; doing so would turn satire into unsupported fact. No independent review of the song was found. The piece works best as topical political comedy, exposing how easily a policy debate can be reduced to a memorable line about who gets to ride comfortably and who is told to make do.
Political song and cabaret have long used comic lists to make privilege visible; this lyric’s catalogue of car models turns public spending into an image people can instantly picture. Its insult-heavy humor is broad, but the contrast between official comfort and ordinary austerity gives it a recognizable satirical target. Because the song does not specify a procurement decision or date, its rhetoric should not be treated as evidence of a particular purchase. The genre’s strength here is compression: a policy argument that might require pages of detail is reduced to a memorable contrast between who rides in a new car and who is told to pedal.

